Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

Exclusivity: Dead or alive?

As a PR professional, I’m often asked by higher ups or even newbies: Do you think we should offer the journalist an exclusive?

Ah, the great exclusive. In today’s highly fluid information-fuelled world, where hardly anything is secret anymore, where does the exclusive come into play? If you have leaked a launch to your customer, the word-of-mouth itself could be built up within your community. Your customers and perhaps some reporters are already expecting news at a certain date and when you finally announce a launch, is that really an exclusive or simply a launch announcement? The reality is this: unless you are Edward Snowden, Lindsey Lohan or have a top and I mean, news or industry breaking, revolutionary, tier-1 story to break, you should not be considering exclusives.

It is not a word to be bandied about lightly. The exclusive is often offered to journalists who are your cream of the crop. And you offer the ONE exclusive. Look at the late Princess Di and Barbra Walters. She had one story to tell, to one of the most powerful women in journalism on one of the most watched news networks in the world.

Do you have that kind of story to tell? How do you know if your story is exclusive-worthy? Whether you are in B2B or B2C, what is considered an exclusive to you, may just be a run-of-the-mill announcement to the reporter.

So what is exclusivity all about? Here are a few things to consider:
  • Is your story strong enough to BE an exclusive? Journalists have no time for bullshit. They want a breaking story that is told to no one but them. Does your story have concrete figures, does it affect how people live; are you unveiling something that has never been seen before; will it bring down the stock market or will are you offering a side of the story that has not been heard?
  • How will it affect your relationship with the rest of your target media? Look at your media list. If you work in B2B, that list would be extremely succinct. Should you risk offending the other journalists on your list just for a single story? Or can you offer them specific angles of the story? Journalists remember things like this and worst of all, they can chose to ignore your company down the road. So really consider all options carefully.
  • Who do you want the story to reach? There is new trend in the way consumer technology companies make their announcements these days. Stories are leaked to the fans.  It is smart and rather sneaky because fans will help generate buzz for the story to drive sales. This tactic may perhaps help navigate tricky relationships with journalists.
  • How much ROI or coverage do you really want to achieve? If your exclusive will eventually be distributed to everyone on your media list, where is your credibility? Down the toilet for sure.
At the end of the day, there is no right or wrong in offering a journalist an exclusive. However, you do have to consider all your options and then decide on an approach. 

So in the race to tell your specific story, are you ready to be exclusive?

Stand for what you believe

Ha! The local daily actually picked up my blog on the censorship of Madonna's video. My very first clipping!

Who said that media monitoring doesnt yield surprises? Sure didn't see that coming...my 15 seconds of fame.

So yes, Big Brother IS watching indeed. Oooo...

posted under , | 0 Comments

Another one bites the dust...!

Living in Singapore can sometimes be a stifling affair.

The government is constantly trying to tell everyone that they are pro-arts, pro-creativity, pro-this, pro-that the only thing they are a pro at is probably givng the people some false hope...or prozac... It could seem like a cruel joke but sometimes, I feel that Singaporeans are living in a real-life Matrix, heck, they probably based the movie on us! But I digress...

Anyhoo, the latest victim of the gahmen's ban-happy policies is of course, Madonna's Confessions Tour Video. How can banning this seemingly controversial DVD possibly help Singaporeans? The one thing the ban will help is of course, drive sales for the video. All that talk about how Singaporeans should be more net savvy? Well, we are and we have been so for many years.

I'm just disapopinted that the government had to force us to use other channels to obtain the stuff that we want. I don't see their point though, like most of the online community, I've also seen the Live to Tell video and while I agree that it is controversial, the performance was very affecting. It spoke to the teenagers and appealed to more than just Madonna fans. The song identified with teenagers who felt isolated and lost and showed viewers the plight of the children in Africa who are suffering from AIDS.

And while the ban only warranted a story in a local rag, the gay community as well as a few of my friends are up in arms with angry cries of What the hell is the government thinking?! Another BAN?! A friend pointed me in the direction of an article in Fridae.com where 34 readers have since posted their comments. Snide comments? Warranted? Of course. The local censors seem to be teasing Singaporeans with their weird sensibilities.

My question is this: Are we truly protecting religious sensibilities or just stifling our people on the pretext of religious sensibilities? Remember The DaVinci Code? Practically everyone had a comment and China went on to ban it. So, why did Singapore pass it uncut and yet choose to ban the Madonna DVD? The public is right in saying that we practice double standards for censorhip as we could cite the same arguments that were used to release The DaVinci Code to defend the release of the Madonna video. This is just entertainment and the public should be able to decide for themselves.

Yes, Madonna used religious symbols and yes, it is a publicity stunt - but it was effective as it gained her the attention and made people sit up to the cause. Why doesn't anyone ask how much money she raised instead? With all the access to overwhelming amounts of information at the click of a mouse, entertainers, businesses and even citizens themselves have to think of more creative ways to stand out from the crowd. So why should anyone be surprised? Media watchers should be aware of her antics by now, gosh, Madonna's been in the business since the 80s! To gasp and point over her antics like feeble old ladies is unbecoming of a country who declares their intentions of becoming a regional media hub. More like media snob! I wonder, how many memebrs of the censorship board have seen the video? The biggest irony would be that they are circulating it among themselves and doing it like the rest of us plebians; watching it in secret. Ah gahmen, gahmen...

Don't get your panties in a twist, people. This is but entertainment. Think for a second. If the performace excluded any of these tactics, would we still watch it? How many of us would even remember the song? Would you rather watch a performance that provokes a reaction or would you rather watch some boring home-made TV variety show with lip synching celebs?

At the end of the day, the local agencies only have themselves to blame for their authoritarian image. Releasing a handful of old movies that no one remembers or even some gay-themed Oscar-winning movies cannot redeem them from their stuffy box, especially since they insist on practicing double-standards censorship. Giving the people a teensy bit of choice makes no difference. Just give us choices and let us decide!

Older Posts Home
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

My photo
Ever prodded a sleeping dragon, only to have it whip up and bite you in the ass? Well, neither have I. But I advocate that you should try everything...once ;P

Followers

Total Pageviews

Blog Archive

Search This Blog